Today I asked a very simple question to the Minister of Education - unfortunately/ fortunately (?) she wasn't here so the question was answered by Bill English. They really have no answers to questions pertaining to Pacific and so I got another pitiful attempt at a response (refer to my Question to Paula Bennett for 'part 1' of pitiful responses to questions pertaining to Pacific people).
The Question was:
CARMEL SEPULONI: Does the Minister consider Māori or Samoan language courses, such as those run at Wellington High School, to be hobby courses or to be courses that improve literacy skills?
The Answer was
Hon BILL ENGLISH: As I have said, the Government will be spending $124 million on adult and community education over the next 4 years, and anyone who is offering a course will have the opportunity, under processes set up by the previous Government, to get it funded.
Maryan Street then raised a point of order:
HON MARYAN STREET: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. That was hardly an answer to the question my colleague asked, which was about Māori and Samoan language classes being considered to be hobby courses or to contribute to literacy skills. Does the Minister have a definition of hobby courses?
The Speaker rules:
Mr SPEAKER: As I heard the answer, the Minister acknowledged that organisations that are running these kinds of courses will apply for funding for the courses to continue. The impression I got from the answer was that the Minister cannot predetermine which courses will be funded. I do not believe that a further, more precise answer to that question can be given at this stage.
OBVIOUSLY TALKING TO A NAT IS LIKE TALKING TO A BRICK WALL!
Tags:
Share
Facebook
-
▶ Reply to This